- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 0
Cubo 12 vs MTH-30
- MAutopsy
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
13 years 8 months ago #12165
by MAutopsy
Replied by MAutopsy on topic Cubo 12 vs MTH-30
Found it! I believe this would be a suitable kick cab for my setup. Should stack nicely.
[attachment=0:750hatzx]<!-- ia0 -->70hz2 12kick.gif<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:750hatzx]
You get my brain working Bitzo smiley20
[attachment=0:750hatzx]<!-- ia0 -->70hz2 12kick.gif<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:750hatzx]
You get my brain working Bitzo smiley20
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- GekoMusic94
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 8 months ago #12172
by GekoMusic94
Replied by GekoMusic94 on topic Cubo 12 vs MTH-30
Nice! What's the reccomended driver?
Edit: Now I see :oops: ! JBL D120 smiley1 .
Edit: Now I see :oops: ! JBL D120 smiley1 .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MAutopsy
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 8 months ago #12173
by MAutopsy
Replied by MAutopsy on topic Cubo 12 vs MTH-30
thats an old guitar speaker. I would probably put something better in
Also looking for something that would sit atop MTH30 nicely, same exterior dimensions. but not TH
Also looking for something that would sit atop MTH30 nicely, same exterior dimensions. but not TH
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cubo15
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 923
- Thank you received: 132
13 years 8 months ago #12279
by Cubo15
Replied by Cubo15 on topic Cubo 12 vs MTH-30
Multiple folds usually indicate a bass rather then a mid bass cabinet. The reverse of this rule of thumb is visible for the mkh and mkb-230, which seem to defer in dimensions and size (the latter 10% smaller).
A single could be made to match the width of an MTH-30.
Best regards
Cubo
A single could be made to match the width of an MTH-30.
Best regards
Cubo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.274 seconds